According to a recent case, the EU law does not include a principle of mutual recognition of positive decisions granting refugee status, as Advocate General Laila Medina has pointed out. This case involves a Syrian national who was granted refugee status in Greece and later applied for international protection in Germany.
The refugee from Syria, who had received asylum in Greece, sought international protection in Germany due to living conditions that posed a significant risk of suffering inhuman or degrading treatment. Germany granted her subsidiary protection despite declining her refugee status, and she appealed the rejection of refugee status in German courts.
This case highlights the issue of what happens when someone is granted refugee status in one EU country and cannot return there due to unfavorable conditions. Advocate General Medina’s opinion, based on the Dublin III Regulation, stresses that the concept of a single responsible Member State does not automatically require acceptance of international protection granted by another EU Member State without a thorough examination.
The Court of Justice of the European Union emphasized the importance of prioritizing the examination of subsequent applications and the use of information exchange mechanisms between Member States. However, it is worth noting that the Advocate General’s opinion is not binding, and the court is not obliged to follow it. The judges are currently discussing the case, and a decision is expected at a later date. Stay tuned for updates!
Still have some travel questions? Ask in our Travel WhatsApp Group .
Want travel tips and news sent directly to you on WhatsApp? Join our Travel WhatsApp Channel .
